From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 1 16:09:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFAC106566B for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:09:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from op@trekdanne.se) Received: from ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.213]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACC9E8FC0A for ; Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:09:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from op@trekdanne.se) Received: from c83-251-38-111.bredband.comhem.se ([83.251.38.111]:53591 helo=localhost) by ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1Ldnz9-0001OQ-91 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:53:48 +0100 Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:55:32 +0100 From: Daniel Lannstrom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090301155532.GA29514@haruhi> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-Originating-IP: 83.251.38.111 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1Ldnz9-0001OQ-91. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp02.sth.basefarm.net 1Ldnz9-0001OQ-91 18f8cb7eca4b31801e3c820c80955115 Subject: Re: Root shell X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Mar 2009 16:09:13 -0000 Why is this not a good idea? The only reason I can think of it that you want your root shell on the root hard drive. As many system use a separate partition for /usr and that bash installs to /usr/local/bin per default I can see how that can cause troubles. But are there any other reasons? Unstability in bash? Unexpected behaivor causing more harm in a root shell? On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 03:50:29PM +0100, Sniper wrote: > I heard that changing root shell to bash is not good idea