From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 12 09:42:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0320C106566B; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:42:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [212.34.63.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B30128FC1C; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org) Received: from dhcp250-188.yandex.ru ([87.250.250.188]) by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x) id 1LMJJO-0008Pa-UN; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:42:22 +0300 Message-ID: <496B107E.2020302@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 12:42:22 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erwin Lansing References: <49695A15.8010801@psg.com> <496A254F.2020500@FreeBSD.org> <20090111175359.GA4231@soaustin.net> <20090111203706.GA39600@droso.net> In-Reply-To: <20090111203706.GA39600@droso.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Randy Bush , Mark Linimon , rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru, Boris Kovalenko , current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: quagga-0.99.11_1 is marked as broken: does not build. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:42:24 -0000 Erwin Lansing wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 11:53:59AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 07:58:55PM +0300, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >>> The fix is already in the port: >>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/net/quagga/files/patch-zebra-kernel_socket.c?rev=1.5 >>> >>> I have no idea why Erwin has marked it as BROKEN again. >> There was no portrevision bump when the patch went in, so pointyhat >> did not rebuild the package. He apparently marked it as BROKEN due to >> the results of the previous run. >> > Indeed. I also check cvs history for the ports Makefile, so I didn't > notice the patch that was added. I removed the BROKEN tag. Thanks, Erwin. -- Dixi. Sem.