From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 29 13:45:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677B6106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:45:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from ey-out-2122.google.com (ey-out-2122.google.com [74.125.78.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081B28FC23 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:45:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so182528eyd.9 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.25.138 with SMTP id z10mr1830271ebb.84.1277819101444; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:45:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.194.147 with HTTP; Tue, 29 Jun 2010 06:44:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C29796C.7070901@acm.poly.edu> References: <4C297844.2030500@acm.poly.edu> <4C29796C.7070901@acm.poly.edu> From: Eitan Adler Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:44:40 -0400 Message-ID: To: Boris Kochergin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd ports Subject: Re: Confirming a bug in clang++ (freeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:45:10 -0000 >>> My bug report is here: http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=3D7489 >>> >>> I want to know if this is my problem or a clang++ problem or a bug >>> somewhere else. >>> >> >> Works fine here: >> >> # uname -a >> FreeBSD peer 8.0-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p2 #2: Mon Feb 22 23:18:= 53 >> EST 2010 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 root@peer:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PEER =C2=A0i386 >> >> # clang++ -v >> clang version 1.1 (branches/release_27) >> Target: i386-portbld-freebsd8.0 >> Thread model: posix >> >> I can try it on a recent CURRENT machine tomorrow, but perhaps you'd bes= t >> share your environment. I've compiled non-trivial C++ programs with clan= g++ >> and they've behaved properly. >> >> -Boris >> > One difference I notice between your environment and mine is that, accord= ing > to your bug report, your program links against > /usr/local/lib/gcc46/libstdc++.so.6, while mine links against > /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6. > > -Boris > I forgot about that. I use gcc46 to build ports and have libstdc++.so.6 gcc46/libstdc++.so.6 in /etc/libmap.conf I guess I should close the bug. --=20 Eitan Adler