From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 24 17:03:34 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0D0616A41F for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:03:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B6043D72 for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:03:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from astrodog@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so146600wra for ; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:03:28 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Pji7tvjGRjOEp9kfER7xh+xkEYoV5bjBtfhZwg/gTIiikt6uK2tmCO5m715QN3Y0kpGmq9rL0jXD4/q6Q+iudrIqge9KgMZuq8jPa5i5yWY+Hl7GZixhXsJS35hpIsPEG2JeicTLwuOwUCU8POss1kWMF2vX85Qt2xiKyU0yMLg= Received: by 10.54.86.11 with SMTP id j11mr5042540wrb; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:03:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.116.7 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:03:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <2fd864e0511240903t7001c3a2gf7355a58b6630063@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 11:03:28 -0600 From: Astrodog To: "Frank J. Laszlo" In-Reply-To: <4384FAE5.40703@vonostingroup.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43850140.4000005@chdevelopment.se> <4384FAE5.40703@vonostingroup.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: i386 do not support i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 17:03:35 -0000 On 11/23/05, Frank J. Laszlo wrote: > Christer Hermansson wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > FreeBSD 6.0R don't support 386 processors according to the release > > notes, maybe it's time to change the name of the i386 platform to the > > x86 platform. > > > > > Do you realize how many things depend on the platform name being i386? > Just thinking of ports alone, I cound probably name a "few." Not very > important, but a huge hastle to switch over. > > -Frank > Mmm. Thanksgiving Day Bikesheds, thy name is "Chris".