From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Mar 28 7:24:17 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF65C37BF38; Tue, 28 Mar 2000 07:24:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from knu@idaemons.org) Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (pc343042.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [203.140.143.42]) by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.1/3.7W 03/13/00) with ESMTP id AAA26946; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:23:22 +0900 (JST) Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id AAA59298; Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:22:50 +0900 (JST) Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:22:48 +0900 Message-ID: <861z4v15mf.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" To: sos@freebsd.dk Cc: des@flood.ping.uio.no, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, sheldonh@uunet.co.za, jkh@zippy.cdrom.com Subject: Re: linux_procfs port In-Reply-To: In your message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:52:20 +0200 (CEST)" <200003281052.MAA99664@freebsd.dk> References: <200003281052.MAA99664@freebsd.dk> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.2.18 (Please Forgive Me) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 9) (Canyonlands) (i386--freebsd) Organization: Associated I. Daemons X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1BEF D9B2 BABD 25D7 659A FD08 89C2 F3BE E981 4E16 MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At Tue, 28 Mar 2000 12:52:20 +0200 (CEST), Soren Schmidt wrote: > > "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" writes: > > > I've made a clean emulators/linux_procfs port, which holds all sour= ce > > > files in it under files/ so we can maintain them within our CVS tre= e. > > > = > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~knu/ports/emulators/ > > > = > > > Please review it and report me bugs, if any. > > > = > > > I'll commit it if no problem. > > = > > Please - the decision to take linprocfs out of the tree has not yet > > been made (to the best of my knowledge). Marcel (maintainer of the > > so-called linuxulator) seems to be in favor of keeping it in the tree= =2E > = > It has been decided that it should moved into the linuxulator, read > the mail on the list from -core. = > = > -S=F8ren Then, should I keep my linux_procfs port unofficial?: http://people.freebsd.org/~knu/ports/emulators/linux_procfs.tar.gz And how about `rtc'? I hacked up a port of it: http://people.freebsd.org/~knu/ports/emulators/rtc.tar.gz This is another kernel module which provides /dev/rtc device, which is useful for something like VMware 2.0. And yes, ol' VMware2 port: http://people.freebsd.org/~knu/ports/emulators/vmware2.tar.gz So, which and which are suitable for ports? Probably we should take the time for more discussion. -- = / /__ __ / ) ) ) ) / Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ / ( (__( "If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message