From owner-freebsd-questions Thu May 17 11:20:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from exodus.ait.co.za (exodus.ait.co.za [66.8.26.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5FF9537B42C for ; Thu, 17 May 2001 11:20:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wizard@sybaweb.co.za) Received: from pm3ctn [66.8.26.4] by exodus.ait.co.za (SMTPD32-4.06) id A5006D4012C; Thu, 17 May 2001 20:20:32 +0200 Message-ID: <026b01c0defd$e0ddd360$0200a8c0@ait.co.za> Reply-To: "Peter Salvage" From: "Peter Salvage" To: References: <015f01c0deeb$855fc1e0$0200a8c0@ait.co.za> Subject: Re: Routing question - lengthy post Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 20:19:14 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Further to my earlier question, I am now assuming (further evidence not presenting itself) that the problem I am experiencing is because I have not defined the necessary static route on the FreeBSD box. I have read the man route pages and request that someone's beady eye be cast over the route statement(s) I want to add, as I am _terrified_ of breaking something :-/ Problem re-defined in abbreviated format: Users are attached to a router on the 192.168.2.228/30 network, said users being allocated the 192.168.2.128/192 network range, are unable to ping/traceroute past the router eth0 interface here. Proposed route statement(s): Route add 192.168.2.228 255.255.255.252 192.168.0.9 Is that enough? Would I also need to add Route add 192.168.2.128 255.255.255.192 192.168.0.9 TIA /wiZZ ----- Original Message ----- From: "Peter Salvage" To: Sent: 17 May 2001 18:07 Subject: Routing question - lengthy post > I'm having a routing problem which I hope someone can help me solve: > So, my conclusion is I need to add a route to the FreeBSD box. > > Am I correct? If so, what would be the correct route statement(s) to add? > add route 192.168.2.128/26 192.168.2.218? > add route 192.168.2.228/30 192.168.2.218? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message