From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 12 18:33:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3A1463 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:33:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kolyasir@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-f45.google.com (mail-qe0-f45.google.com [209.85.128.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92274D97 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:33:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id b4so102046qen.18 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:32:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DEbhseZPK68bkABPJQigRX89U8G58bVr2PTBfSBOB9c=; b=tSATUsi0745seJJz+Sm0J+dDyIOFBjeKNbMy6ln9o/Q4lTfPqbIpkRtAza0mJfZu+e LTy01HeYIe5k9HN9aQz/10mlsDbjWGMLT0xbp6BL2+U+dBpVd3nNT6aJAM6LyQ/aeiIR 3jNGZ0iP+nn7kDANgfXiQJ8yKRZTE3mIiEbQy5EWpQ/LL8vhnX5kXWkI40+Q8bGDEawz klhAg6BcSbtxkGKcn7eWjtiFGDD/t8LMQbVqYfZT33SckjEsAoVL4JJ8vr3o6916BhmE iNqkyHJCcT2v8EAEs3jW5/KZO4t3nOKfEv024OZJUquted6yaFNiN5PXEyGKLJQDo3L+ cl6g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.216.8 with SMTP id hg8mr24062203qab.74.1363113177187; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:32:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.48.197 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 11:32:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 23:32:57 +0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: using multiple interfaces for same Network Card From: Yasir hussan To: Ian FREISLICH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Tom Evans , Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 18:33:03 -0000 Yes, i want to use them as vlan interface, Does any one has used *vlandev*, after seen this http://www.cyberciti.biz/faq/howto-configure-freebsd-vlans-with-ifconfig-command/i tried to use it as ifconfig vlan11 create 10.10.11.1 255.255.255.0 vlan 11 vlandev arge0 ifconfig vlan12 create 10.10.12.1 255.255.255.0 vlan 12 vlandev arge0 ifconfig vlan13 create 10.10.13.1 255.255.255.0 vlan 13 vlandev arge0 ifconfig vlan14 create 10.10.14.1 255.255.255.0 vlan 14 vlandev arge0 i was expecting that it will create interfaces which will work under arge0, and will able to ping from any pc, Does any one have used it, kindly guide me about it Thanks On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Ian FREISLICH wrote: > Yasir hussan wrote: > > Thanks for notic but all the elebration was for make alias on one > > interface but i want to have multiple interface, i can no where that > > some one would have tring to creating new interfaces and using them, > > or may be i am missing something, just send its solution if have, > > solution should be for > > I still think you're confusing Linux semantics with FreeBSD semantics. > > On linux you would have: > eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:C9:53:0B:61 > inet addr:10.0.0.1 Bcast:10.0.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > inet6 addr: fe80::21e:c9ff:fe53:b61/64 Scope:Link > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > RX packets:211328068 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:368394006 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 > RX bytes:34065846811 (31.7 GiB) TX bytes:476377525764 (443.6 > GiB) > Interrupt:169 Memory:e6000000-e6011100 > > eth0:1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:1E:C9:53:0B:61 > inet addr:10.0.1.1 Bcast:10.0.1.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 > UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 > Interrupt:169 Memory:e6000000-e6011100 > > > On FreeBSD you would have: > > re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > > options=8209b > ether 54:04:a6:96:0c:1e > inet 10.0.0.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255 > inet 10.0.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT ) > status: active > > These are both the same thing. Is there any particular reason that > you want multiple interfaces? I can't see a use for it beyond "it's > what I'm used to seeing" unless they're VLAN interfaces. > > Ian > > -- > Ian Freislich >