From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Jun 19 04:26:45 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id EAA08066
          for current-outgoing; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 04:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA08061
          for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 04:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id EAA04105 for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 04:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
To: current@freebsd.org
Subject: fetch - time to kill ncftp?
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 1996 04:26:36 -0700
Message-ID: <4103.835183596@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Ya know, the only reason I ever brought ncftp into the source tree was
so that bsd.port.mk could use it, and now that we have `fetch' I'm
wondering if we might not throw a bone to the anti-bloatists and move
ncftp back to the ports collection?

If there are no major outcries to the contrary, I'll do it in a few
days.

					Jordan