From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 14 05:28:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC8B016A501; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:28:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from mail.lovett.com (foo.lovett.com [67.134.38.158]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B2AD43D45; Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:28:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from hellfire.canal.lovett.com ([172.16.32.20]:51559) by mail.lovett.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1G1GE8-0002LO-FU; Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:28:36 -0700 In-Reply-To: <813466C3-8E34-4886-9689-044086F4F64C@dragondata.com> References: <813466C3-8E34-4886-9689-044086F4F64C@dragondata.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <7376DAAA-4C67-495F-A532-5A86C47E8F75@FreeBSD.org> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ade Lovett Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 22:28:35 -0700 To: Kevin Day X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Sender: ade@lovett.com Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org, Ade Lovett Subject: Re: Current favorite FC HBA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 05:28:37 -0000 On Jul 13, 2006, at 15:05 , Kevin Day wrote: > > Previously we used the LSI 929 series HBAs, but they have been > EOL'ed and are getting hard to find. > > What's the current favorite FC HBA out there in terms of support in > 6.1? We exclusively use Qlogic 2342's for our FC HBAs. Works great, modulo some minor hacks we had to put into isp(4) to deal with some insanely braindead JBODs (sure, we'll advertise every disk on luns 0-255 ....). Very heavy-duty IO environment, too. Now, if someone(tm) would produce a decent JBOD solution that provide 2*2Gbps FCAL to a 3U 16-bay U160/U320 SCSI box, I'd be insanely happy. SATA just doesn't cut it for that particular part of our application, and full-blown FCAL drives are stupidly expensive. -aDe