Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Aug 2004 01:33:16 +0400
From:      Roman Kurakin <rik@cronyx.ru>
To:        John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: LOR
Message-ID:  <4121281C.10006@cronyx.ru>
In-Reply-To: <200408161159.11250.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4120A660.9070909@cronyx.ru> <200408161159.11250.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin:

>On Monday 16 August 2004 08:19 am, Roman Kurakin wrote:
>  
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>    Question to gurus. Does witness keep in mind lock recursion when
>>it checks for LORs.
>>    
>>
>
>Well, I'm not sure if I understand exactly what you are asking, but witness 
>
My question was silly cause it is based on very silly ideas.

>only does lock order checks when you first acquire the lock.  Any recursive 
>locks will skip the order checking altogether since recursive acquires can 
>never block.  Similarly, trylock operations also stick order checks 
>
You've answered just that I want to know. Thanks!

>altogether since they can never block either.
>
rik






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4121281C.10006>