From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jun 22 22:37:07 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@nevdull.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E522AE
 for <freebsd-fs@nevdull.freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:37:07 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com)
Received: from douhisi.pair.com (douhisi.pair.com [209.68.5.179])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03DF7C8
 for <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>; Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:37:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from quartz@sneakertech.com)
Received: from [10.2.2.1] (pool-173-48-121-235.bstnma.fios.verizon.net
 [173.48.121.235])
 by douhisi.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F08D83F760;
 Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:37:05 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <55888E0D.6040704@sneakertech.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 18:37:01 -0400
From: Quartz <quartz@sneakertech.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6;
 rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: kpneal@pobox.com
CC: FreeBSD FS <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ZFS raid write performance?
References: <5587C3FF.9070407@sneakertech.com> <5587C97F.2000407@delphij.net>
 <55887810.3080301@sneakertech.com> <20150622221422.GA71520@neutralgood.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150622221422.GA71520@neutralgood.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Filesystems <freebsd-fs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs>,
 <mailto:freebsd-fs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2015 22:37:07 -0000

>>> a single hard drive won't do much beyond 100MB/s (maybe
>>> 120MB/s max) for sequential 128kB blocks, so that "landing pad" would
>>> probably not very helpful assuming you can saturate your GigE network
>>
>> Wait, I'm confused. A single GigE has a theoretical max of like
>> 100mb/sec. That would imply the drive is probably about the same speed?
>
> You won't get the theoretical max what with the overhead of Ethernet
> packets, TCP/IP overhead, and SMB protocol overhead.

Right, I know that, that's why I don't understand what Xin Li was trying 
to say.

I guess a better way to word the question is: would a raidzX using 
generic drives, samba, and 500mb-4gb files be notably slower at writing 
than ~70mb/sec. I have a feeling not, but I wanted to double check.