From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Dec 3 06:05:12 1996 Return-Path: owner-smp Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id GAA16059 for smp-outgoing; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 06:05:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from gargoyle.bazzle.com (gargoyle.bazzle.com [206.103.246.190]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id GAA16048 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 06:05:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from gargoyle.bazzle.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gargoyle.bazzle.com (8.8.3/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA04237 for ; Tue, 3 Dec 1996 09:05:10 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 1996 09:05:10 -0500 (EST) From: "Eric J. Chet" To: smp@freebsd.org Subject: performance In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-smp@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 2 Dec 1996, Eric J. Chet wrote: > Kernel compile times: > > smp-kernel compiled under -current (as of 12/01) > >time make > > 314.39s real 282.00s user 18.72s system > > smp-kernel compiled under -smp-current > >time make -j8 > > 213.57s real 338.08s user 77.12s system > Hello Just looking at the numbers again, food for thought. (u+s)/r == utilization. -current (282.00+18.72)/314.39 = .96 -smp-current (338.08+77.12)/213.57 = 1.94 !!! very good! I know there is a lot of development work to be done, but -smp is definitly on the right path. Eric J. Chet - ejc@bazzle.com