From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 5 14:02:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 77F00685 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:02:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (bizet.nethelp.no [195.1.209.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B3CB7FB5 for ; Fri, 5 Dec 2014 14:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 72556 invoked from network); 5 Dec 2014 13:55:59 -0000 Received: from bizet.nethelp.no (HELO localhost) (195.1.209.33) by bizet.nethelp.no with SMTP; 5 Dec 2014 13:55:59 -0000 Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:55:58 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20141205.145558.74680295.sthaug@nethelp.no> To: borjam@sarenet.es Subject: Re: Fix Emulex "oce" driver in CURRENT From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: References: <8BA1A243-8EA9-449A-A2D2-4E03487CE3E0@sarenet.es> <5481AC78.6050107@multiplay.co.uk> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, killing@multiplay.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2014 14:02:43 -0000 > >> Seems 10.1 is on the pipeline now, but as far as I know none of th= ese fixes have been applied to -STABLE. Any chances to do it yet? As fa= r as I know, the "oce" driver is currently unusable in -STABLE. I manag= ed to cause a panic reliably within 30 seconds. > > = > > Was there any conclusion to this, current and releng/10.0 & releng/= 10.1 seem pretty similar with regards oce but a customer is reporting p= anics very similar to this thread. > > = > > Did the commit of the additional locking never make it in? > = > Not as far as I know. I=B4ve updated a couple of machines here to 10-= STABLE and I've been applying the patch manually myself. = > = > I don't think it's been applied even to -HEAD. = Where can I find a version of the patch to be applied to 10-STABLE? Is this the one? https://bz-attachments.freebsd.org/attachment.cgi?id=3D144718 Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no