Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 22:18:43 +0200 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portmaster is not always recursive Message-ID: <4AA56AA3.1000100@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908301307540.11734@qbhto.arg> References: <4A89CB20.3000408@quip.cz> <4A8E2121.6040507@FreeBSD.org> <4A8E8ACA.3060705@quip.cz> <4A8EF583.8090806@FreeBSD.org> <4A9966FE.7060509@quip.cz> <4A998242.80005@FreeBSD.org> <4A999B4A.3000603@quip.cz> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908300952370.43298@qbhto.arg> <4A9ADAE6.70506@quip.cz> <alpine.BSF.2.00.0908301307540.11734@qbhto.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote: [...] >> So the last thought is some new option for portmaster to force >> reinstall of all intermediate dependencies between A and E, even if >> there are no updates for them. > > > The -f option already does this. > >> Thank you again for you explanation of the problem. It is really >> educational to me. I know about -f, but it "always" forces update of dependencies. I mean something "inteligent" to do update of intermediate dependencies only in case when some bottom dependency will be updated. It is just an idea... Miroslav Lachman
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4AA56AA3.1000100>