Date: 28 May 1999 04:45:15 -0000 From: Sergey <serge69@nym.alias.net> To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: [Q] How stable is FreeBSD 3.X ? Message-ID: <19990528044515.12319.qmail@nym.alias.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I've checked this out on good hardware. And now can CLAIM that
> 3.1-R *really* have kernel problems on FreeBSD's "classic" configuration.
> This bug causes TERRIBLE instability - panic in 24 hours. Even Microsoft's
> OSes gives significantly better results
>
*** MY PUBLIC APOLOGIZES FOR THIS MESSAGE. ***
Someone just points me out that my message was INSULTING
to FreeBSD's developers.
!!! I DO NOT INTEND TO INSULT ANYONE !!!
I've just wanted ironically point out fact that developrs ignore malformed
user reports, but they have true basis.
The irony of fate I missed ';)' sign after words 'better results'. And in
such
form my message DID become insulting. My answers was also too rude, if
treat it in such way.
I think till this moment it was ironycal not insulting, but sent version was
not.
AGAIN AND AGAIN. I'M VERY SORRY...
P.S.: Will never try write "ironical" messages again. This lesson was
enough good for me ;)
SORRY, SERGEY.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19990528044515.12319.qmail>