Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:30:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/65924: XFree86-4-libraries won't include in xc/lib/X11 Message-ID: <200404240430.i3O4UN5H079090@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR ports/65924; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Coleman Kane <cokane@cokane.org> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: misc/65924: XFree86-4-libraries won't include in xc/lib/X11 Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 21:24:22 -0700 On Fri, Apr 23, 2004 at 08:07:20PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote: > > >Number: 65924 > >Category: misc > >Synopsis: XFree86-4-libraries won't include in xc/lib/X11 > >Confidential: no > >Severity: non-critical > >Priority: low > >Responsible: freebsd-bugs > >State: open > >Quarter: > >Keywords: > >Date-Required: > >Class: sw-bug > >Submitter-Id: current-users > >Arrival-Date: Fri Apr 23 20:10:24 PDT 2004 > >Closed-Date: > >Last-Modified: > >Originator: Coleman Kane > >Release: FreeBSD 5-current > >Organization: > >Environment: > FreeBSD blah 5.2-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #0: Fri Apr 23 03:59:18 GMT 2004 root@blah:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BLAH i386 > > >Description: > x11/XFree86-4-libraries won't configure. Dies at making includes in xc/lib/X11 on building makekeys. > >How-To-Repeat: > Build x11/XFree86-4-libraries from ports > >Fix: > Modify the xc/config/cf/FreeBSD.cf file, and remove the NULL-quote from the SystemMTDefines #define. GCC interprets this as an argument, an input file named <NULL>, which it cannot find and it dies. > > --- FreeBSD.cf Sat Apr 24 02:43:59 2004 > +++ FreeBSD.cf.old Sat Apr 24 02:46:00 2004 > @@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ > # endif > # define HasPosixThreads YES > # define ThreadedX YES > -# define SystemMTDefines > +# define SystemMTDefines "" > /* > * FreeBSD has tread-safe api but no getpwnam_r yet. > */ This patch won't apply; what you describe is a side-effect of files/patch-FreeBSD.cf. However there has to be more to the story, because the port has been building successfully on 5.x for the past 2 months that the patch has been in place. Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200404240430.i3O4UN5H079090>