Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 13:23:36 +0200 From: Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org> To: Patrik Sundberg <ps@radiac.mine.nu> Cc: Clive Lin <clive@CirX.ORG>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Feature request Message-ID: <20000529132335.A19617@mithrandr.moria.org> In-Reply-To: <20000529122403.A87267@radiac.mine.nu>; from ps@radiac.mine.nu on Mon, May 29, 2000 at 12:24:03PM %2B0200 References: <20000529095445.A86482@radiac.mine.nu> <20000529173145.A17004@host.cer.ntnu.edu.tw> <20000529122403.A87267@radiac.mine.nu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon 2000-05-29 (12:24), Patrik Sundberg wrote: > yes - in a way, but that wasn't what I wrote, I talked about the problem of > new versions using bogus @pkgdep's in their CONTENTS-files. But my proposed > scheme with multilevel /var/db/pkg-entries could maybe fit into an upgrade > scheme aswell - needs to know when to move the +REQUIRED_BY entries and > other stuff too, upgrade is bigger than what I am talking about. I can't see the major difference between "/var/db/pkg/gtk-1.2.3" and "/var/db/pkg/gtk/1.2.3". Why would we want the multilevel /var/db/pkg system again? Neil -- Neil Blakey-Milner Sunesi Clinical Systems nbm@mithrandr.moria.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000529132335.A19617>