From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 06:57:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CE537B401 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 06:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (comp-ext.chem.msu.su [158.250.32.157]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E22843F93 for ; Wed, 28 May 2003 06:56:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: from comp.chem.msu.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.3p2/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h4SDuoSH031530; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:56:50 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar@comp.chem.msu.su) Received: (from yar@localhost) by comp.chem.msu.su (8.12.3p2/8.12.3/Submit) id h4SDulsT031525; Wed, 28 May 2003 17:56:47 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from yar) Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 17:56:47 +0400 From: Yar Tikhiy To: "Simon L. Nielsen" Message-ID: <20030528135646.GD30273@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <200305231907.h4NJ7ubu089890@manor.msen.com> <200305231542.36266.bmilekic@unixdaemons.com> <20030523195346.GA66202@nitro.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030523195346.GA66202@nitro.dk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i cc: Bosko Milekic cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mbuf reference? (and missing man page) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 13:57:01 -0000 On Fri, May 23, 2003 at 09:53:48PM +0200, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > On 2003.05.23 15:42:36 +0000, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > > On May 23, 2003 07:07 pm, Michael R. Wayne wrote: > > > Missing man page: > > > 4.8 releasse - man netstat has a reference to mbuf(9) but man mbuf > > > says: No manual entry for mbuf > > > > True. This is a bug. Someone from -doc should fix this, because > > mbuf(9) only exists in 5.0 and later. Try submitting a PR and > > filing it to -doc. Here's a link to an on-line version of the mbuf(9) > > man page appearing in 5.x: > > Actually there is a two PR's open for this already: docs/44337 and > docs/50463. So it will be dealt with when someone gets around to it... It was me who has written the initial version of mbuf(9) and now I have a bit of spare time, so I'll deal with this problem immediately. Thank you who have contributed to this thread for collecting together all the relevant pointers. -- Yar