From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 31 13:54:10 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50216106564A for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:54:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Thomas.Gellekum@gmx.de) Received: from mailout-de.gmx.net (mailout-de.gmx.net [213.165.64.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A3328FC17 for ; Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2012 13:54:07 -0000 Received: from xdsl-78-34-204-53.netcologne.de (EHLO siegel.tg.intern) [78.34.204.53] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 31 Aug 2012 15:54:07 +0200 X-Authenticated: #18235045 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/H9IEOKpXHLFbEkBvZqJqXd3Hhu++v2w1+nbP+m3 0Sidos1bxax+b+ Message-ID: <5040C1FD.7000906@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:54:05 +0200 From: Thomas Gellekum User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120727 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Lewis References: <503E4B40.4070307@gmx.de> <20120831021716.GA80123@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20120831041836.GA77989@misty.eyesbeyond.com> <20120831131341.GA17440@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20120831131341.GA17440@misty.eyesbeyond.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade of eclipse-devel to 4.2.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 13:54:10 -0000 On 08/31/12 15:13, Greg Lewis wrote: > Looks good other than that to me. I ran into an SVN hurdle committing it > though. files/freebsd-support.patch operates on multiple files and there > are a few with DOS line endings. SVN pukes on commit since it doesn't want > mixed line endings in a file. Anything I could say to that won't be appropriate for a family-friendly mailing list. And partly unfair to the SVN developers. > yet. I'm not sure where to plug in a call to dos2unix ot the like to fix > the file before its patched. We could call the "unpack" target in post-extract, just like we call "applyPatches" in post-patches. And maybe use tr(1)? tg