From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 28 22:33:49 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@Freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B071065686;
	Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from mail.ciam.ru (mail.ciam.ru [213.247.195.75])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1400C8FC16;
	Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:33:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sem@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [77.41.76.79] (helo=[172.16.100.4])
	by mail.ciam.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.x)
	id 1Kk4So-000POA-77; Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:10:02 +0400
Message-ID: <48E0002C.2020803@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 02:07:40 +0400
From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@freebsd.org>
References: <20080928054620.GA80250@k7.mavetju>	<20080928093357.GA71582@ice.42.org>
	<20080928094903.GB13745@k7.mavetju>
In-Reply-To: <20080928094903.GB13745@k7.mavetju>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Stefan `Sec` Zehl <sec@42.org>, stable@freebsd.org, current@Freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Request for testing - top 3.8b1 in the base system
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2008 22:33:49 -0000

Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> Oh yes, I forgot about that:
> 
> The old top(1) and new top(1) counts the processes different:
> 
> - "ps xauw | wc" gives 265
> - "ps xauwH | wc" gives 295 (expand threads)

But what about running processes?
I have quad core processor with the summary lines:
new top: 127 processes: 5 running, 104 sleeping, 18 waiting
old top: 90 processes:  1 running, 89 sleeping

Let's see what process is running:
% ps axuwH | awk '{if(index($8,"R")) print}'
root        12 100.0  0.0     0     8  ??  RL   14Sep08 20648:50.71 
[idle: cpu2]
root        13 100.0  0.0     0     8  ??  RL   14Sep08 20647:09.32 
[idle: cpu1]
root        14 100.0  0.0     0     8  ??  RL   14Sep08 20640:25.87 
[idle: cpu0]
root        11 86.1  0.0     0     8  ??  RL   14Sep08 20650:27.95 
[idle: cpu3]
sem      71228  0.0  0.0  3204   996  p7  R+    1:59AM   0:00.00 ps axuwH

Is it correct idle cpu pseudo processes are counted?

Anyway new top looks much better. Thanks, Edwin!

PS. 7.1-PRERELEASE from May 10.

-- 
Dixi.
Sem.