From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 11 14:07:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A58516A469 for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnsanchez@wait4.org) Received: from sumo.dreamhost.com (sumo.dreamhost.com [66.33.216.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14E5813C48A for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnsanchez@wait4.org) Received: from spunkymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (sd-green-bigip-81.dreamhost.com [208.97.132.81]) by sumo.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1412196AAF for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:50:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sauron.lan.box (200-180-186-51.paemt706.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.180.186.51]) by spunkymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08298FE3AF for ; Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:50:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:49:49 -0300 From: Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20070711104949.7cc844e9.rnsanchez@wait4.org> In-Reply-To: <4694AC5C.9040107@trzask.int.pl> References: <20070708081511.GX1221@funkthat.com> <200707101833.l6AIX0xl049962@ambrisko.com> <20070710.205751.-1962670861.imp@bsdimp.com> <4694AC5C.9040107@trzask.int.pl> Organization: SYS_WAIT4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.2 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-unknown-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: new friend of sys/queue.h and sys/tree.h X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 14:07:38 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 10:09:32 +0000 Pawel Wieczorek wrote: > Hash table are basic data structure, it is good to have it in kernel, > but i did not see some easy to use framework like sys/queue.h in our > kernel. >From what I understood, the actual implementation is based on lists (SLIST, specifically)? -- Ricardo Nabinger Sanchez rnsanchez@wait4.org Powered by FreeBSD "Left to themselves, things tend to go from bad to worse."