Date: 02 Feb 1998 19:02:57 +0100 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Recompiling just kmem programs? Message-ID: <xzpra5lopf2.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Nate Williams's message of "Mon, 2 Feb 1998 10:47:48 -0700" References: <199801301658.JAA26173@harmony.village.org> <199801301957.MAA17366@mt.sri.com> <xzp3ei2cdsc.fsf@grjottunagard.ifi.uio.no> <199802021747.KAA27920@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> writes: > > Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> writes: > > > # make obj && make depend && make && make install > > 'make obj depend all install' oughta be enough for anyone. > Actually, no. Would you care to elaborate? :) The general idea is that you want to make each of these targets, in order, and stop everything if one of them fails. Doesn't 'make obj depend all install' do just that? Or is there a problem with dependencies not being re-read after being regenerated or someting like that? I usually (and successfully) do 'make depend all install' to rebuild my kernel... -- * Finrod (INTJ) * Unix weenie * dag-erli@ifi.uio.no * cellular +47-92835919 * RFC1123: "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpra5lopf2.fsf>