From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 10 12:36:42 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A44E116A41F for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:36:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0479B43D53 for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:36:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bogorodskiy@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 36so1948946wra for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:36:40 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:x-pgp:user-agent; b=c0eWD/E5xhPGJZs1TIUZOjHVysMUhNBOgsaU4B/VOtuB8MeTP2EcJqWPbUDWVrkGkKXYXkR1GDczmZH/I7QDSynJSqv82SmN19CtF67Y0pC6iGQoQ8QBzMNpBBYU64Z4HY880hfEmapMsdSyszlxhj8lmqBkpdKQ2ug7acO/7to= Received: by 10.54.57.13 with SMTP id f13mr1171324wra; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:36:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ( [194.186.150.176]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 34sm741283wra.2005.09.10.05.36.33; Sat, 10 Sep 2005 05:36:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 16:38:02 +0400 From: Roman Bogorodskiy To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20050910123802.GA669@lame.novel.ru> References: <200509091534.j89FY2Qi043829@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050909170934.GA42230@xor.obsecurity.org> <20050910044627.GA761@lame.novel.ru> <20050910052129.GA49500@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050910052129.GA49500@xor.obsecurity.org> X-PGP: http://people.freebsd.org/~novel/novel.key.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Roman Bogorodskiy , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/security/gnutls Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 12:36:42 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Kris wrote: > > > > Modified files: > > > > security/gnutls Makefile=20 > > > > Log: > > > > Don't CONFLICTS with gnutls-devel since it has been removed. > > >=20 > > > What if users still have it installed? > >=20 > > There were no ports which depended on gnutls-devel in ports tree. So I > > don't think many users have it installed. And if they really have, I > > suppose they should use security/gnutls instead. Though I can revive > > CONFLICTS if you think it is needed. >=20 > I'm pretty sure there were, previously. Even if there were, I think it's quite obvious that port which has been removed from the ports tree should be deinstalled from user's system,=20 isn't it? BTW, portupgrade notes when there are such kind of ports in the system. I think the proper solution is deinstalling obsolete port (i.e. gnutls-devel in our case) from the system, but not CONFLICTing with dead ports' ghosts. And Porters Handbook doesn't say we should CONFLICT with nonexistent ports. Am I missing something? Roman Bogorodskiy --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUBQyLTqoB0WzgdqspGAQJXbwQAjlcHPbYgEJcY+P22KIoSV3HqVUtNsegk aX/7DlYGhAcru5F/epzJDUvtEbVGaPKPraHtw/o6Ch9z7hzKP5ifEY1jSjfbSLvC qXKti9WT3cNWXOwGvmriWfr5aX07ISfdar0b2dCFJ8TOi/sl0oOCuRrpBGyXPdBu L7EE8T+5KAE= =FlzZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+--