Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:34:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 224242] Some FLAVOR related changes Message-ID: <bug-224242-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D224242 Bug ID: 224242 Summary: Some FLAVOR related changes Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Only Me Priority: --- Component: Ports Framework Assignee: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Reporter: FreeBSD@ShaneWare.Biz CC: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org After the FLAVOR change I think there are a couple of things that still nee= d to be addressed that affect concurrent python port installs. As package repos = now have two flavours for many python ports, trying to install one using the pkg origin will break the install due to conflicts. 1. USE_PYTHON=3Dconcurrent should be considered a default option, or part of implementing flavour, maybe have noconcurrent if a port specifically doesn't need it. 2. Using concurrent still has an issue of conflicting man pages, see bug #220214 as a possibile solution for this. 3. If a port is python3 only then no default scripts exist, only the versio= ned script is created. See bug #216479. 4. Would it be possible for pkg to record the package flavour so that it ca= n be queried? Maybe even a config option to control what flavours it will instal= l? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-224242-13>