From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 3 09:24:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA8116A420 for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:24:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C47C43D4C for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:24:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k139Oc1J008079 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:24:39 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.23] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k139Oc3e029765 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:24:38 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <20060203080120.GB976@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <43E2E2F1.70206@u.washington.edu> <20060203050813.GA45810@xor.obsecurity.org> <43E2F43B.1000303@u.washington.edu> <43E30BDD.9090005@cs.tu-berlin.de> <20060203080120.GB976@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Garrett Cooper Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 01:25:56 -0800 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: Any idea when Xorg 7.0's coming to FBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 09:24:47 -0000 On Feb 3, 2006, at 12:01 AM, Stijn Hoop wrote: > On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 08:53:01AM +0100, Bj=F6rn K=F6nig wrote: >> Garrett Cooper schrieb: >>> Erm, unless 6.9 is modular (which I didn't think was the case), =20 >>> there >>> should be a noticeable difference. >> >> The noticeable difference is that 7.0 takes much more time to compile >> all in all because of its modularity. A German magazine tested =20 >> both: 6.9 >> took 19 minutes and 7.0 75 minutes on their dual Opteron 246 machine >> with 2 GB RAM (source: iX 1/2006). > > Heh :-) > > But the advantage *should* be that you don't need to recompile all of > that every major upgrade. I don't know what will become of that ideal > though, only time will tell I guess. > > --Stijn > > --=20 > MY HATE OF D02 KNOW NO LIMIT > -- A Silent Wail, http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?=20 > s=3D&threadid=3D31914 I know it took a while to compile everything, but it seems like this =20 release is much better than the 6.8.x releases. -Garrett=