Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2002 11:11:08 +0100 From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: burncd/cdcontrol Message-ID: <20021027101108.GA92719@tara.freenix.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210261705180.78755-100000@root.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210261625140.13443-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0210261705180.78755-100000@root.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
According to Nate Lawson: > You got it backwards -- is atapicam complete enough to work reliably with > cdrecord? There's no reason for us to replicate a more feature-complete > port in our src tree. Yes it is. gcombust + cdrecord + atapicam is prefect for that and works fine. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun 4 22:44:19 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021027101108.GA92719>