From owner-freebsd-www Sun Aug 10 17:44:47 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA27313 for www-outgoing; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 17:44:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from news.IAEhv.nl (root@news.IAEhv.nl [194.151.64.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA27303 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 17:44:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from LOCAL (uucp@localhost) by news.IAEhv.nl (8.6.13/1.63) with IAEhv.nl; pid 11722 on Mon, 11 Aug 1997 00:44:41 GMT; id AAA11722 efrom: peter@grendel.IAEhv.nl; eto: www@freebsd.org Received: (from peter@localhost) by grendel.IAEhv.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) id AAA01035; Mon, 11 Aug 1997 00:24:07 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <19970811002405.18113@grendel.IAEhv.nl> Date: Mon, 11 Aug 1997 00:24:05 +0200 From: Peter Korsten To: www@freebsd.org Subject: Packages next to ports? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.67e Sender: owner-freebsd-www@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I don't know if this is the right address, but I don't see an alternative listed, so here goes. I've been wondering for some time, why the packeges (if available) arent listed alongside the ports. Personally, I find packeges more elegant (a lot like the tarballs for Irix systems). I can do a search and find the package I want, but not with the category list. Maybe, if feasible, it's good idea to add them? - Peter