From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 08:30:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F04516A4D3 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:30:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31CC43D46 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 08:30:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i23GUeej033521 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:30:40 GMT (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)id i23GUevi033520; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:30:40 GMT (envelope-from matthew) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:30:40 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman To: Ed Budd Message-ID: <20040303163040.GB32905@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matthew Seaman , Ed Budd , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20040303082443.5804a947.ebudd@grokking.org> <20040303132914.GC11526@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040303090009.4d09fbbd.ebudd@grokking.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8GpibOaaTibBMecb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040303090009.4d09fbbd.ebudd@grokking.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: latest security advisory and 5.1R X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 16:30:52 -0000 --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 09:00:09AM -0500, Ed Budd wrote: =20 > I think what's confusing me here is that I assumed that 5.1R was > still "officially supported" and every other advisory up to this one has > been included, like last week's FreeBSD-SA-04:03.jail advisory, for > example. So am I to assume then that as of this week 5.1R is no longer > "officially supported"? Hmmm... Well, the official word on the subject should be the page at http://www.freebsd.org/releng/index.html, and yes, that does imply that 5.1-R is a "supported security fix branch", but a quick check in CVS shows no patches have been applied to that branch. =20 There are some changes in the affected files in src/sys/netinet/ between RELENG_4_8, RELENG_4_9, RELENG_5_1 and RELENG_5_2, but the patch applied to 5.2 was quite similar to the one applied to 4.8 or 4.9, so I'd guess that the affected section of code is still there in the RELENG_5_1 sources. No idea if you can merge in the changes on the RELENG_5_2 branch to the RELENG_5_1 branch without modification though. You might want to ask on freebsd-security@ if 5.1-R is still a supported security fix branch. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFARggwdtESqEQa7a0RArm0AJ9IDW9WVF6St7Z13IRHKyi/1/8e+gCdEza/ NaCmQ+nifOqtrOWCh1EeTrg= =eiaV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8GpibOaaTibBMecb--