From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 11 17:55:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ACDA16A4CE for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:55:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (outmx008.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.3.235]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E975943D2D for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:55:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geert@lori.mine.nu) Received: from outmx008.isp.belgacom.be (localhost [127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP id i6BHtKbC022909 for ; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:21 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: from lori.mine.nu (166-18.244.81.adsl.skynet.be [81.244.18.166]) with ESMTP id i6BHtG9k022866; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:16 +0200 (envelope-from ) Received: by lori.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6836689D; Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:15 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 19:55:14 +0200 From: Geert Hendrickx To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20040711175514.GA21000@lori.mine.nu> References: <1089277280.236.12.camel@Desolation> <20040708232618.531e6fd7@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <20040709064558.GA14282@lori.mine.nu> <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200407091324.16445.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-GPG-Key: http://www.win.ua.ac.be/~s005085/gnupgkey.txt X-GPG-Key-ID: 1024D/766C1E92 X-Accept-Language: nl,en cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X servers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jul 2004 17:55:28 -0000 On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 01:24:16PM -0500, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Friday 2004-07-09 01:45 am, Geert Hendrickx wrote: > > > Anyway, I would very much like to see FreeBSD supporting both of them > > (AFAIK, they would be the only one who do). > > Out of curiosity, why would you like to see them continue to support > XFree86? Why not? At the moment, differences between the two are small, but in the future they probably will both have interesting new features. The Ports also offer multiple shells, multiple window managers, ... so why not multiple X-servers? > It seems that most (all?) new development is moving toward X.org > and the XFree86 seems slated for stagnation and obsolescence. Political > issues aside, I think that X.org is where all of the action is. I don't see why. XFree86 has been offering us the best free X-server for years. It always worked fine for me. And why would BSD care about a GPL-incompatible licese? GH