Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:46:32 -0500
From:      Pierre-Luc Drouin <pldrouin@pldrouin.net>
To:        Jan Henrik Sylvester <me@janh.de>
Cc:        x11-list freebsd <freebsd-x11@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: xf86-video-intel upgrade, anyone?
Message-ID:  <4D2510E8.9060607@pldrouin.net>
In-Reply-To: <4D2508C0.1040303@janh.de>
References:  <20110105091240.GF1850@uriah.heep.sax.de>	<20110105082509.GA57232@somecodehere.com>	<20110105132302.GG1850@uriah.heep.sax.de>	<AANLkTimw=OX3YkdTU6j02wWdFMNorpa76jKCBYW4gZ2%2B@mail.gmail.com>	<4D24D817.9050009@janh.de>	<AANLkTimPPOtwc5qE2AvP=e-wWYxaJqmfBa0T5dOuyRqT@mail.gmail.com>	<4D24E600.7040108@janh.de> <AANLkTinOb15oyur98tvLsWyt4Hh6HH9NRSwjeKp-SCa7@mail.gmail.com> <4D250357.60404@janh.de> <4D250B2C.3060904@pldrouin.net> <4D2508C0.1040303@janh.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/05/11 19:11, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
> On 01/06/2011 01:22, Pierre-Luc Drouin wrote:
>> On 01/05/11 18:48, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
>>> suspend/resume work, even though that is only possible for a few month
>>> now. Since then, it has never failed to resume for me, but I rarely
>>> use it.
>>
>> When you say that it works, does it require to turn off SMP or anything
>> that affects performance or battery life?
>
> Turning of SMP would not be "it works" for me. As I said, Firewire 
> does not survive suspend/resume and produces many messages about it 
> for the log, but I have not noticed anything else failing, yet.
>
> Cheers,
> Jan Henrik
I don't mind having to unload any kernel module not required by X before 
suspending. The only thing I want to make sure is that I don't have to 
boot the computer using only a single core or that I have to exit from X 
before suspending in order to be able to resume correctly. So that part 
works, right?

Thanks



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D2510E8.9060607>