From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 25 20:08:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F93216A4CF; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:08:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0416D43D6B; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:08:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i7PK8Dng010265; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:08:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@ns1.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i7PK8Ccj010264; Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:08:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 13:08:12 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Wilko Bulte Message-ID: <20040825200812.GA10169@ns1.xcllnt.net> References: <20040824183019.GA82339@freebie.xs4all.nl> <1093387784.3554.28.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> <20040824231428.GB4049@dhcp53.pn.xcllnt.net> <1093390484.3554.45.camel@klamath.ankon.de.eu.org> <20040825000027.GB4182@dhcp53.pn.xcllnt.net> <20040825172812.GG53710@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040825183154.GA9663@ns1.xcllnt.net> <20040825190720.GA5136@freebie.xs4all.nl> <20040825193829.GA5587@freebie.xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040825193829.GA5587@freebie.xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: alpha@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-BETA1 for Alpha available X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:08:15 -0000 On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 09:38:29PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > > > Does it make sense to remove syscons from GENERIC? I mean, it's annoying > > > > No, that would be overly radical. > > > > If TGA causes problems we should de-orbit TGA from the installkernel. Works for me. > > I think that a normal VGA card should not cause any problems. > > OK, like I assumed: a plain VGA console on a 164sx works like a charm with > BETA1. Ok, good. It means we're not entirely dead in the water. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net