From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Tue Nov 15 16:00:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345DCC4387C for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from mailhost.m5p.com (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:2001:418:3fd::f7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E67F512F0 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailhost.m5p.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id uAFFxv1H020564 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:00:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from george+freebsd@m5p.com) To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List From: George Mitchell Subject: Symbol/library versioning ... Message-ID: <6427851f-5485-39bd-6690-8acd79e3f47d@m5p.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 10:59:57 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on scollay.m5p.com X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mailhost.m5p.com [IPv6:::1]); Tue, 15 Nov 2016 11:00:08 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:00:10 -0000 ... is a topic I just marginally understand. But pkg 1.9.3 fails on FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE-p35 because /lib/libc.so.7 contains no definition for "openat", though /lib/libc.so.7 on 10.3-RELEASE-p11 does define it. I confess to being baffled. How is this supposed to work? 10.1-RELEASE is still supported, right? -- George