From owner-dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org Mon May 31 19:21:32 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: dev-commits-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417CE64D463 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 19:21:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrtc27@jrtc27.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Fv4sS12nFz4k7C for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 19:21:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrtc27@jrtc27.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id t4-20020a1c77040000b029019d22d84ebdso116801wmi.3 for ; Mon, 31 May 2021 12:21:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jrtc27.com; s=gmail.jrtc27.user; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hR1zi/xP4VEOUbZxM9J+WDCaj/p3CwRonyZiqXcTLMU=; b=HzgpapgxcpwIHCWGo9aUQFhLk3EAbbojt1k3JYU1tG+UIP6rZDgd7KW/oiwYrGPOfk 1/SxIGoZvfLtuVZNMWMTcZoLcNfWkYv5W0uQUu9Z7jEjnYVNsL4Tgtf6SE5eiE5h8HUC cxJbGJyaVVOHEYmlGmXSxD9xTqKF/iBsief7csD8DlhON//RFyd89wAfV4OKGmST3/+q irvdSip7rXR8DSzqAUFKPkeqfBzgsesZk/osBBQMWZH667qyK1EcVaG02AbQk8mUgrd8 Iun27epXSAlbKectjk748+3PDeOEmBAn/RMSaXuWZJiJ14dBjqLD2H2hJ3l5k5HbvIv1 uN2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hR1zi/xP4VEOUbZxM9J+WDCaj/p3CwRonyZiqXcTLMU=; b=hHclXFAwuWj85pJU113NO1dIQIsd6J4lbXCNRmeQBpqOnNoQx/JIb0YncVtsVZ9bFe JPjcbMDc3JcQErz5qgf9L3Sy7VXBYtoXNbjUVyjicmbN1plUpopA+tn54lnRuAEL5arv W/6UqIMBbv3aa1O1/lZaPdKIRe04XCjbGY3U2imwc1fS18nZnKLnf106Smo0JFtHez6K Am9NqTDGucTMDIET44xc8FTlFdyabNx6EoiwzkY69XErzsN835oK+fRbq/JBOMknPo04 g+1BdI3HVkoee0O+c1cHyRATrfmnp7jQdmi7iSz7buufFT01DXJNlgoLg4rd1zFQJcdm t64A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532+Z4UaguXUjn6Y8ymzUZ2pWZUFGoWrZC/UTeEh456E3YcDMYid T9+vpkV2hDfS5AKjiTmk8EqD9Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzAjnjeH0D7h6vQ1pZM9HO4DVfvjQII0Dj28T32sWSG9HAnNJGBotSuqcxgc2TUSD7AXEzCCA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:896:: with SMTP id l22mr22593457wmp.164.1622488890712; Mon, 31 May 2021 12:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtpclient.apple (trinity-students-nat.trin.cam.ac.uk. [131.111.193.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm832283wrf.0.2021.05.31.12.21.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 31 May 2021 12:21:30 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.100.0.2.22\)) Subject: Re: git: 5a20c351ea45 - main - [skip ci] add a CODEOWNERS file From: Jessica Clarke In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 20:21:29 +0100 Cc: Ed Maste , Alan Somers , src-committers , "" , dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <202105302249.14UMnbcl094541@gitrepo.freebsd.org> To: Warner Losh X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.100.0.2.22) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Fv4sS12nFz4k7C X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Commit messages for all branches of the src repository List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 May 2021 19:21:32 -0000 On 31 May 2021, at 20:16, Warner Losh wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On Mon, May 31, 2021, 1:11 PM Ed Maste wrote: > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 11:51, Alan Somers wrote: > > > >> > >> I think this file isn't the right place for (another copy of) this > >> text; perhaps the CODEOWNERS file should just reference the = top-level > >> MAINTAINERS? > > > > Except that CODEOWNERS is in a format that tools know how to parse. = If anything, MAINTAINERS should be a symlink to CODEOWNERS. >=20 > At least the file's location and user IDs suggest that it is specific > to GitHub; in any case I don't really care which one points to which. > I hope we can agree though that we don't really want two different > files representing code ownership in different ways that both > independently refer to a third mechanism for recording code ownership > that's external to the source tree? >=20 > It also works on gitlab, FWIW. The format is standard. Bummer we can't = generate it based on where it is published=E2=80=A6 We could conceivably have a CODEOWNERS.master from which the others can = be generated via `make codeowners` whenever someone edits it. Whether = that=E2=80=99s worth the hassle of implementing though for a file that = shouldn=E2=80=99t regularly be changing is unclear. Jess