From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 15 17:50:18 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91197106568B
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:50:18 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from xorquewasp@googlemail.com)
Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.157])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 209718FC1C
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:50:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id e21so821157fga.13
	for <freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:date:from:to:subject
	:message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition
	:in-reply-to; bh=/Y+matJGhuJrOmfKzXBTSE/UHow5MjTvckQ1E+MPidM=;
	b=WpVmjZgYVZ01Rb4d/6YQ//CFvHaLLc1v4877F+2iSoY9tSeozv5pZq3d9ka5YTYuF4
	Y+/V1l2JSX6diFxiHH0xX27OMW85ewEDv1yceq/99cL3aoPQOhZHv/SuWm5RF9mXhTHm
	5/lZUqxD5oUDHZGuEvbKtEG88KSZD+B2obV8c=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to;
	b=SUXPDy+76yzO6a46cNACBl9MWove+axXNABokoE7f5Llx0bE2ymKQUjWj3GUBbqsj3
	muLuhAKi2q/5zhXyw/Jxn+ITrnCh2BNSAaeuNNFzYYfs+BdTYCLEj8FBRNmTSRhFULYD
	MT/cZEQvRYhRd+1kdM620AHA3oNOFh481XIt8=
Received: by 10.86.214.34 with SMTP id m34mr6448311fgg.6.1253037016586;
	Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viper.internal.network (dsl78-143-222-147.in-addr.fast.co.uk
	[78.143.222.147])
	by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 3sm387308fge.17.2009.09.15.10.50.14
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
	Tue, 15 Sep 2009 10:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by viper.internal.network (Postfix, from userid 11001)
	id 86F9D4AC65; Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:50:13 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 18:50:13 +0100
From: xorquewasp@googlemail.com
To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20090915175013.GA76444@logik.internal.network>
References: <20090914051402.GB44046@logik.internal.network>
	<20090915173935.GA34173@logik.internal.network>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090915173935.GA34173@logik.internal.network>
Subject: Re: Problems with qemu networking on 7.2-RELEASE-amd64?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems
	<freebsd-emulation.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-emulation>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-emulation-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:50:18 -0000

> I don't know anything about your particular issue, but VirtualBox should be
> able to run those qemu images, and it's bridged networking is now working in
> addition to the previously working nat.  IME, VBox is significantly faster
> and more robust than qemu, especially in the network realm.

Indeed.

It still seems quite immature on FreeBSD, though. I can't tolerate unstable
code in the kernel on this particular machine.  I imagine practically anything
is more robust than qemu, but at least a crash in qemu just requires running
the program again...