From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jul 19 17:40:58 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B267016A4DD
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:40:58 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from stb@lassitu.de)
Received: from koef.zs64.net (koef.zs64.net [213.238.47.30])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67F5D43D5F
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:40:46 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from stb@lassitu.de)
Received: (from stb@koef.zs64.net) (authenticated)
	by koef.zs64.net (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id k6JHeHcK056963
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:40:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stb@lassitu.de)
In-Reply-To: <17596.26134.831813.158138@canoe.dclg.ca>
References: <17596.26134.831813.158138@canoe.dclg.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed
Message-Id: <C61DFAA2-A478-4F4A-BAC7-87DBBBEF2AC9@lassitu.de>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 19:40:12 +0200
To: David Gilbert <dgilbert@dclg.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2)
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: On the use of Tun interfaces.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 17:40:58 -0000

Am 18.07.2006 um 06:39 schrieb David Gilbert:

> [3:15:315]dgilbert@canoe:~/devel/failsafe> netstat -rn
...
> 192.168.22.1       192.168.12.2       UH          0        0   tun0
>
> shouldn't the last route there be active?  Any clues here?

The last time I tried to get a tun interface set up (admittedly, back  
in 2.2 days), I had similiar problems with weird routing entries.   
IIRC, when configuring the tun interface, I failed to initialize all  
sockaddr's properly. The interface looked right, but the routes were  
botched. memset took care of it then.


HTH,
Stefan

-- 
Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de>   Fon +49 170 346 0140