From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov 10 20:15:24 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCF6816A4D3
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:15:24 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A9643D60
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:15:19 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: from apollo.backplane.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	iAAKFJvA062570	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:15:19 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by apollo.backplane.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id iAAKFJkD062569;
	Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:15:19 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:15:19 -0800 (PST)
From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <200411102015.iAAKFJkD062569@apollo.backplane.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
References: <200411101801.iAAI1SkK061883@apollo.backplane.com>
Subject: Re: bugs in contigmalloc*() related to "page not found in hash"
	panics
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 20:15:25 -0000

   Minor correction.  The 'start = 1' part of the patch is not required,
   I missed the fact that the second loop was starting at start + 1.

						-Matt