From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 13 08:55:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B30E16A41C; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:55:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vsevolod@highsecure.ru) Received: from mx.jet.msk.su (mx.jet.msk.su [62.117.74.155]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AF643D45; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:55:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vsevolod@highsecure.ru) Received: from host1.internal.jet.msk.su ([193.124.4.1] helo=tiger.jet.su) by mx.jet.msk.su with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Dsd1x-0004c7-KC; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:55:49 +0400 Received: from [192.168.10.144] (helo=kiwi.service.jet.msk.su ident=postfix) by tiger.jet.su with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Dsd1n-0000zV-OC; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:55:39 +0400 Received: from [192.168.10.62] (hds-mita.service.jet.msk.su [192.168.10.62]) by kiwi.service.jet.msk.su (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA541BD9C; Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:55:35 +0400 (MSD) Message-ID: <42D4D46B.7080100@highsecure.ru> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:44:27 +0400 From: Vsevolod Stakhov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050203) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ade Lovett References: <42CF4853.701@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <42CF4853.701@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Ben Gross Subject: Re: spamprobe and Berkeley DB X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 08:55:52 -0000 Ade Lovett wrote: > Ben Gross wrote: > >>First, thanks for keep the port up to date. Overall, the spamprobe port >>works well. The only issue for me is it has an old berkeley DB port, >>db4 hard coded which is less reliable than the newer Berkeley DB ports. >>If the Berkeley DB selection code could be ripped from another port >>such as www/apache2, security/cyrus-sasl2 or mail/ postfix and put in >>the spamprobe port it would make it much easier to use db42 or even db43. > > > A more logical approach would be to develop appropriate code for > USE_BDB/USE_BDB_VER/WANT_BDB = (3,4,41,42, maybe even 185 for base > system), and implement that in bsd.port.mk, in a similar manner to the > MYSQL and PGSQL knobs. I've already make this (so called bsd.bdb.mk). Should I send PR about it? > It could even warrant a separate bsd.database.mk file where such things Yes, but who is now working on this?