From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 2 16:07:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (unknown [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58375433 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:07:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) Received: from chinatsu.takeda.tk (mail.takeda.tk [74.0.89.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039221591 for ; Wed, 2 Jan 2013 16:07:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.16.178] ([162.119.232.80]) (authenticated bits=0) by chinatsu.takeda.tk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r02G7GsH049372 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 2 Jan 2013 08:07:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: References: <12.BF.00942.82514E05@smtp02.insight.synacor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Does / Is anyone maintaining CVS for FreeBSD? From: Derek Kulinski Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 08:05:11 -0800 To: Eitan Adler , Chris Rees Message-ID: <145c92bb-a450-4078-9f82-6ed17123a3ad@email.android.com> X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.6 at chinatsu.takeda.tk X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: FreeBSD , Thomas Mueller X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 16:07:29 -0000 Eitan Adler wrote: >On 2 January 2013 06:26, Chris Rees wrote: >> To clarify, no-one wants to remove CVS completely, the suggestion was >to >> move it out of the base system. > >As the developer responsible for this: > >CVS will be removed from base. It already exists as a port in >devel/cvs Will svn be added to the base? Not long ago I run into an issue when trying to downgrade my system to 9.0. After I noticed how majority of ports were broken due to changes in the libc I decided to back out by fetching 9.1 release just to learn that svn does not work as well. There were a lot of dependencies I decided to use portupgrade which required me to recompile ruby. After that it was a lot of compiling (for example Apache because apr was broken). Having svn in the base would save tons of time in my situation. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.