Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2020 22:26:46 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: powerpc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245511] lang/gcc9: build with base GCC on powerpc64 elfv1 Message-ID: <bug-245511-25139-JYli0OmqgE@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-245511-25139@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-245511-25139@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245511 --- Comment #5 from Piotr Kubaj <pkubaj@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #4) Thanks, it indeed works. I thought I tested that approach already, but I clearly didn't. Please, don't disable gcc9-devel for powerpc*. Even if there are no users of those on powerpc*, gcc*-devel serve as great testing bed to check that the = next release will build just fine (especially because you don't do tests on powerpc*). This is why I think that gcc10-devel should build as well, even though no port depends on it (regarding to my earlier PR about gcc10-devel = on powerpc64 elfv2). Why are those changes crippling GCC? I understand that it will run slower, = but so is the case already for GCC 7 and 8. I think it's still better from rela= ying on bootstrap compiler. It will also make it easier for you to remove GCC 8 ports in the future. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245511-25139-JYli0OmqgE>