Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 15:41:38 +0000 (UTC) From: Eitan Adler <eadler@FreeBSD.org> To: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: svn commit: r228233 - head/sys/kern Message-ID: <201112031541.pB3FfcXG045765@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Author: eadler (ports committer) Date: Sat Dec 3 15:41:37 2011 New Revision: 228233 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228233 Log: - Fix typos s/(more|less) then|\1 than/ Submitted by: Davide Italiano <davide.italiano@gmail.com> Approved by: brucec MFC after: 3 days Modified: head/sys/kern/subr_blist.c Modified: head/sys/kern/subr_blist.c ============================================================================== --- head/sys/kern/subr_blist.c Sat Dec 3 14:54:44 2011 (r228232) +++ head/sys/kern/subr_blist.c Sat Dec 3 15:41:37 2011 (r228233) @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ * * This module implements a general bitmap allocator/deallocator. The * allocator eats around 2 bits per 'block'. The module does not - * try to interpret the meaning of a 'block' other then to return + * try to interpret the meaning of a 'block' other than to return * SWAPBLK_NONE on an allocation failure. * * A radix tree is used to maintain the bitmap. Two radix constants are @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ * the memory subsystem. In contrast, the rlist code may allocate memory * on an rlist_free() call. The non-blocking features of the blist code * are used to great advantage in the swap code (vm/nswap_pager.c). The - * rlist code uses a little less overall memory then the blist code (but + * rlist code uses a little less overall memory than the blist code (but * due to swap interleaving not all that much less), but the blist code * scales much, much better. * @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ * to cover the number of blocks requested at creation time even if it * must be encompassed in larger root-node radix. * - * NOTE: the allocator cannot currently allocate more then + * NOTE: the allocator cannot currently allocate more than * BLIST_BMAP_RADIX blocks per call. It will panic with 'allocation too * large' if you try. This is an area that could use improvement. The * radix is large enough that this restriction does not effect the swap @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ static MALLOC_DEFINE(M_SWAP, "SWAP", "Sw * blist_create() - create a blist capable of handling up to the specified * number of blocks * - * blocks - must be greater then 0 + * blocks - must be greater than 0 * flags - malloc flags * * The smallest blist consists of a single leaf node capable of @@ -841,7 +841,7 @@ blst_meta_fill( * * Initialize our meta structures and bitmaps and calculate the exact * amount of space required to manage 'count' blocks - this space may - * be considerably less then the calculated radix due to the large + * be considerably less than the calculated radix due to the large * RADIX values we use. */
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201112031541.pB3FfcXG045765>