From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 16 14:00:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB1F1065675; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:00:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2F7E8FC14; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:00:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bms@incunabulum.net) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 570F1362124; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:00:52 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:00:52 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: QpaFVkwhGE4FMZRExhYtAtJ6x9NwS66CUJtAZ92R6YCn 1245160852 Received: from [192.168.123.18] (82-35-112-254.cable.ubr07.dals.blueyonder.co.uk [82.35.112.254]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B6E8E239BC; Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:00:51 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4A37A591.1070907@incunabulum.net> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 15:00:49 +0100 From: Bruce Simpson User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vlad Galu References: <20090601161903.GA40377@stack.nl> <4A24457C.6060100@FreeBSD.org> <200906020842.42330.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: Unnamed POSIX shared semaphores X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:00:53 -0000 Vlad Galu wrote: > ... > Thanks, Ivan. I'll take a better look at this after our first release, > which is due in a couple of weeks. Right now the team efforts aren't > focused on portability, so it's a low priority issue, but something > we'd definitely like to have in the future. > I've just run head first into this lack for a proof-of-concept I'm looking at -- the lack of PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED support on FreeBSD. Are there any other references I can start working from? cheers, BMS