From owner-cvs-all  Sun Jun  4 18:21:32 2000
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 608)
	id CFBE237B555; Sun,  4 Jun 2000 18:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb@hub.freebsd.org>
To: jkh@zippy.cdrom.com
Cc: wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu, jwd@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
In-reply-to: <22036.960073573@localhost> (jkh@zippy.cdrom.com)
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/df df.1 df.c
Message-Id: <20000605012128.CFBE237B555@hub.freebsd.org>
Date: Sun,  4 Jun 2000 18:21:28 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> > 
> > That's called `BLOCKSIZE=1G df', thank you very much.
> 
> BZZZZT.  You could do df -k with `BLOCKSIZE=1K df' too but I don't see
[snip]
> FWIW, I didn't like the idea of another flag much either (we gonna add
> -g to du(1) next?  It has a -k flag too) but I couldn't argue against
> it from a POLA or consistency standpoint (there is -k AND there is

	yes, seems if we are going to add -g to df, we should add it
to du as well.  just one and not the other is confusing.   simarily we
should add a -m to both df and du.  having -k and -g but not -m is
very strange indeed.

jmb


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message