From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 4 23:26:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6114116A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:26:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from m00.ca.astound.net (m00.ca.astound.net [64.85.239.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78E3843FDD for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:26:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rchopra@cal.berkeley.edu) Received: from cal.berkeley.edu (astound-66-234-212-148.ca.astound.net [66.234.212.148]) by m00.ca.astound.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hB57Ooq8029176; Thu, 4 Dec 2003 23:24:50 -0800 Message-ID: <3FD03310.1030907@cal.berkeley.edu> Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2003 23:26:08 -0800 From: Rishi Chopra User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5b) Gecko/20030901 Thunderbird/0.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko" , dnelson@allantgroup.com, questions@freebsd.org References: <3FCEF97C.2020401@cal.berkeley.edu> <20031204155842.6a34a888.doublef@tele-kom.ru> <3FCFB3D1.10602@cal.berkeley.edu> <20031205072836.1dc10281.doublef@tele-kom.ru> In-Reply-To: <20031205072836.1dc10281.doublef@tele-kom.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new Subject: Re: growfs says 'we are not growing' ?!?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2003 07:26:25 -0000 Problems have been resolved, thanks again for the help =) -Rishi Sergey 'DoubleF' Zaharchenko wrote: >On Thu, 04 Dec 2003 14:23:13 -0800 >Rishi Chopra probably wrote: > > > >>I get: >> >>growfs: we are not growing (1048576 -> 0) >> >>So I took a look at your email, and you said: >> >>"You've grown the slice, but you need to also expand the >>partition before growfs can resize the filesystem." >> >> > >It wasn't my email. > > > >>This is what confuses me. The slice (da0s1, called partition in your >>quote?) is taking up the whole disk. It is the only slice on the disk, >> >> > >No, you will need to grow the *partition* using disklabel. What does >`disklabel -r da0s1' say? > > > >>and spans the entire disk. Any idea why I'm getting the error? >> >>-Rishi >> >> > > > >