Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Feb 2001 18:27:15 -0800
From:      Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
To:        Cedric Berger <cedric@wireless-networks.com>
Cc:        Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND 
Message-ID:  <200102200227.f1K2RHv02933@cwsys.cwsent.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 19 Feb 2001 17:53:59 PST." <3A91CE37.F8C3FE80@wireless-networks.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3A91CE37.F8C3FE80@wireless-networks.com>, Cedric Berger 
writes:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> 
> > A registry-like configuration store, which was cached by the OS,
> > and was referenced directly each time the data was needed, instead
> > of allowing the programs to cache data which might change would
> > really be the best approach, but I rather think that it would be
> > rejected because Microsoft had the idea.
> 
> Microsoft??? the idea of registry???
> If I remember my old university days, our VAX 11/780 had something
> very simmilar...

That makes sense.  Dave Cutler, chief NT architect, worked on VMS for 
DEC.


Regards,                         Phone:  (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert                        Fax:  (250)387-5766
Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca
Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
Province of BC





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102200227.f1K2RHv02933>