Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 16:27:48 +0100 From: Pietro Cerutti <gahr@gahr.ch> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@freebsd.org> Cc: wenheping <wenheping2000@hotmail.com>, Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: RE: svn commit: r410453 - in head/math/fityk: . files Message-ID: <7e7d04735f3c99081fd672ce35544382@gahr.ch> In-Reply-To: <731F52BF0474DA3AD0CC4A5E@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <BLU168-W101BAF80F561B4B29A45AAAACB20@phx.gbl> <E5010340890C09BE8EF68750@ogg.in.absolight.net> <d90fdb7ea886d2ff2da13739a913a2b1@gahr.ch> <731F52BF0474DA3AD0CC4A5E@ogg.in.absolight.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2016-03-08 16:25, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 8 mars 2016 16:06:59 +0100 Pietro Cerutti <gahr@gahr.ch> wrote: > | So, danfe@, would you mind explaining to me on which basis muting > MKDIRs > | is "at one's discretion" while muting INSTALLs is "actually wrong"? > | > | Given the evidence pointed at by mat@, either both muting MKDIR and > | INSTALL commands is at one's discretion, or neither is. > > Ok, the IMPORTANT bit here, is that the *install* phase is the most > important one from the end-user point of view. > > It's where things go live, and his system is modified. > > So we want to show up things thare are modifying his system. All of > them. > > Some argue that mkdir are not that important and can be muted, I kinda > disagree. > > And as the doc is how portmgr thinks things should be (in that case, > it's > been a couple of years where that means what *I* think), well, it's how > I > documented it. I completely agree with you. -- Pietro Cerutti gahr@gahr.ch PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7e7d04735f3c99081fd672ce35544382>