From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 6 16:10:06 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69DC2106564A for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD968FC13 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p16GA6Ib069349 for ; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:10:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p16GA6LB069348; Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:10:06 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 16:10:06 GMT Message-Id: <201102061610.p16GA6LB069348@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: David Naylor Cc: Subject: Re: ports/151747: request to enable emulators/wine on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Naylor List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2011 16:10:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/151747; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Naylor To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org, kenorb@gmail.com Subject: Re: ports/151747: request to enable emulators/wine on amd64 Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 18:08:48 +0200 --nextPart7013142.EJLr4MYl8T Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sunday 06 February 2011 16:31:14 Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, David Naylor wrote: > >> Shouldn't USE_LDCONFIG32 use WINELIBDIR instead of repeating the > >> stuff? > >=20 > > Agreed. >=20 > Looking into the patch, I believe we can avoid the introduction of > WINE_SLAVE_BUILD by making this >=20 > .if !defined(USE_LDCONFIG32) > USE_LDCONFIG=3D ${WINELIBDIR} ${WINELIBDIR}/wine > .endif >=20 > and will give it a try. Yes, that is the way I originally did it but I felt WINE_SLAVE_BUILD was le= ss=20 cryptic. Either way is fine for me. =20 > Also, do we really need the CONFLICTS? emulators/wine is > ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=3Di386, whereas your port is for AMD64 only. Actually, wine-fbsd64 is also ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=3Di386. Since FreeBSD does no= t=20 support cross building ports this port has to be built in an i386 environme= nt.=20 This port does run in an i386 environment. The only way I know of to deliv= er=20 an amd64 port is to use binary packages. =20 The intention of this port is for those who want to build wine/i386 that wi= ll=20 work with FreeBSD/amd64 (using the patches I have provided), and since it i= s=20 fairly easy to build an i386 chroot this will greatly reduce the complexity= =2E =20 > >> post-install-wine: is really brutal; I'd hope FreeBSD will gain > >> proper combined 32-/64-bit support at one point. > >=20 > > Agreed but I do not think there is sufficient demand to warrant the > > effort. I suspect an approach similar to this one will suffice for > > the few ports that are required to run under amd64. >=20 > As time goes by, 32-bit support in a 64-bit OS becomes less important. > It has been hugely important for customer in $DAYJOB, and I would not > underestimate the amount of 32-bit legacy applications out there. >=20 > Gerald --nextPart7013142.EJLr4MYl8T Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAk1Ox5cACgkQUaaFgP9pFrKI6QCfYkbemuKc/gqQqN/nB0vnJVu5 D0IAn2aJ58MiY3FFIvwbJql39gReK4vY =k91L -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart7013142.EJLr4MYl8T--