Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2015 09:46:06 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org> To: Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org> Cc: arch@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Removin the old make Message-ID: <20150213084606.GM29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> In-Reply-To: <1423788447.80968.123.camel@freebsd.org> References: <20150210223854.GT29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <201502122349.t1CNnD43027915@fire.js.berklix.net> <20150213002456.GK29891@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <1423788447.80968.123.camel@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MqkwUViToTQK+HjE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 05:47:27PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Fri, 2015-02-13 at 01:24 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:49:13AM +0100, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > >=20 > > > > I would like to start using bmake only syntax on our infrastructure= for tha=3D > > > > t I > > > > want to make sure noone is using the old make, so I plan to remove = the old =3D > > > .................................................^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > > > make > > > > =3D66rom base, I plan to do it by Feb 16th. > > > >=20 > > > > Note that bmake is the default since FreeBSD 10. > > > > FreeBSD 9.3 is also providing bmake (as bmake) on default installat= ion. > > > >=20 > > > > Best regards, > > > > Bapt > > >=20 > > > I don't know the difference, but it seems potentialy dangerous to > > > remove old make without notice ? > > >=20 > > Old make was already removed in 10.x what remains is only the sources a= nd that > > is what I propose to remove from 11 (and only from 11) > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Bapt >=20 > fmake exists as a port too, doesn't it? That's what I vaguely remember > as the plan... bmake available in 9, it's the default in 10 but fmake > source is still around, and then in 11 fmake is gone from base but > available as a port. >=20 Yes it is in port for sure. Bapt --MqkwUViToTQK+HjE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlTduc4ACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EzrIQCeMb2V6jynVUmS41XXqYyj9gke 65YAniw8ww4DpS4O47zueKz8QDa4vHmc =TPb/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MqkwUViToTQK+HjE--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150213084606.GM29891>