Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Nov 2005 17:14:13 +0100
From:      Marc Fonvieille <blackend@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        freebsd-www@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: www/en/layout/css global.css
Message-ID:  <20051111161412.GB1736@gothic.blackend.org>
In-Reply-To: <4374BE73.8090100@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <20051109202421.GA612@nosferatu.blackend.org> <4372F031.8060603@FreeBSD.org> <20051111095133.GA600@gothic.blackend.org> <43746EB5.80001@FreeBSD.org> <20051111103036.GC600@gothic.blackend.org> <43747A66.1090400@FreeBSD.org> <20051111133553.GA1176@gothic.blackend.org> <4374ADD9.4010007@FreeBSD.org> <20051111152157.GA1736@gothic.blackend.org> <4374BE73.8090100@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 04:53:23PM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Marc Fonvieille wrote:
> >ahhh *this* is different; from my point of view what you are describing
> >is more subjective than a real rendering issue.
> 
> It may be subjective, but it becomes less subjective when a single-line 
> spans on two rows (for example language selection) or words exceed the 
> boxes' borders (for example security advisories): this means that the 
> font is too big for this layout.

This example is not subjective, I agree this is a real problem too.

> *Personally* I prefer this size, but 
> for me it's ok even a little bigger, *if* the text will correctly fit in 
> the layout.

I agree.  My word "subjective" was to make a difference between abnormal
rendering bugs like the ones we (you, Kris, me, etc.) described and the
fact the overall page font size may seem small or big according to user
taste.

Marc



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051111161412.GB1736>