Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 05:23:57 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 213987] devel/boost-libs: fix for lang/gcc5 Message-ID: <bug-213987-25061-1l7RVsFRvI@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-213987-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-213987-25061@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D213987 Jan Beich (mail not working) <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |Rejected Status|New |Closed --- Comment #1 from Jan Beich (mail not working) <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> --- Likely obsoleted by ports r426908. Even if not, please, describe build environment in more detail e.g., backed by poudriere logs and if there're l= ocal patches. Don't forget to quote errors which are crucial when remuving cruft= in future. Also, if the compiler is buggy it should be patched rather than stacking mo= re hacks into consumers. While GCC 4.2 in base can't be patched retroactively = the ports can and *should*. > +.if ${COMPILER_TYPE} =3D=3D gcc > +CXXFLAGS +=3D -std=3Dgnu++11 -D_GLIBCXX_USE_C99=3D1 -include cmath devel/boost-libs is fragile if consumers are built with different compiler = or flags. Adding -std=3Dgnu++11 would require an exp-run. Besides, GCC in base doesn't support C++11 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-213987-25061-1l7RVsFRvI>