From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Fri Aug 17 13:37:55 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701CC106F232 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2BA7DE67 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B3075106F230; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A208A106F22F for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 325F37DE60 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79C751E4C4 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id w7HDbrgQ072347 for ; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id w7HDbrcf072346 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 230705] net/samba48 conflicts with ldb from port Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:52 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: se@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: timur@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version rep_platform op_sys bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter flagtypes.name Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2018 13:37:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D230705 Bug ID: 230705 Summary: net/samba48 conflicts with ldb from port Product: Ports & Packages Version: Latest Hardware: Any OS: Any Status: New Severity: Affects Some People Priority: --- Component: Individual Port(s) Assignee: timur@FreeBSD.org Reporter: se@FreeBSD.org Assignee: timur@FreeBSD.org Flags: maintainer-feedback?(timur@FreeBSD.org) The recent upgrade of samba defines SAMBA4_BUNDLED_LDB and thus causes a conflict with ldb from ports that are required b some 10 packages on my sys= tem and thus cannot be de-installed. This problem does probably affect quite a number of people, which cannot upgrade Samba to a version without the secur= ity vulnerabilities that are fixed in this version. The reason to use the bundled ldb appears to be, that the databases/ldb13 p= ort has not been upgraded to version 1.3.5, yet. Just changing the version number and creating a matching distinfo file was sufficient to get ldb13-1.3.5 compiled and working. So, I do not see any reason that the samba48 port could not continue to use= the ldb13 from a port and thus avoid the conflict! (I'm CCing to timur@ as the registered maintainer of the ldb13 port.) The same problem may exist for the other samba4* ports, I did not check ... --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=